MATT DIBIASE SUCKS …. 🥸
I’M ANTHONY “MIKEY” RINALDI A PROUD DAD AND MAINER WHO NEEDS YOUR HELP!!!
ChatGPT CONFIRMED Pierce v Rinaldi WORST ABUSE OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN MAINE HISTORY! PLEASE EMAIL SENATOR HICKMAN LINK BELOW
MATT DIBIASE SUCKS …. 🥸
ChatGPT CONFIRMED Pierce v Rinaldi WORST ABUSE OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN MAINE HISTORY! PLEASE EMAIL SENATOR HICKMAN LINK BELOW
At the trial last summer—more than two years after this meeting—the only evidence presented by corrupt attorney Monteleone was the perjured testimony of Andy Lord. Yet in this very audio, Monteleone dodges questions about Lord’s two false affidavits.
At one point, Monteleone says, “How would Drew know why Andy had a conversation with Craig Matheson (Drew’s banker)?” and follows with, “Drew doesn’t know why Andy spoke with Craig.” But at trial, Drew testified that he directed Andy to have that exact conversation—completely contradicting what was said in this meeting.
Corrupt attorney Monteleone repeatedly refused to answer questions about the integrity of his lawsuit, brushing it off with statements like, “I don’t need to prove anything to you—I have to prove it to the judge.” Given that I was denied a jury trial without cause, and Monteleone’s smug, dismissive attitude, it’s clear this case was rigged from the start!
During this meeting, I called out how his story had changed, and he responded by saying, “This is the nature of discovering as we go - we work with what we have when we have it” He even asked, “What do you expect, Drew to learn what you told him and essentially change his position?” Most telling of all, he said, “You’re not going to convince me that we have a different interpretation of the facts.”
In other words, corrupt Attorney Monteleone openly admitted he doesn’t care about the truth. He‘s willing to twist facts, change stories,
and commit fraud - so long as it helps him win!
DEMAND AN OPEGA INQUIRY JUST CLICK THE LINK BELOW AND ADD YOUR NAME.
CHATGPT FULL ANALYSIS COMING SOON!!!
***NOTE: JUSTICE BILLINGS IS WELL AWARE THAT MY REALTOR SLIMY MATT DIBIASE WAS THE PLAINTIFFS STAR WITNESS AND BOTH REALTORS ARE LANDING AGENT BUT HE HAS THE NERVE TO ASK ME HOW THIS RECORDING IS RELEVANT!! Nonetheless, During trial, Justice Daniel Billings did everything in his power to suppress my evidence. He would routinely object on his own—despite no objections from the Plaintiff. But the moment I truly knew this trial was rigged was when the Justice made a deliberate effort to block me from submitting my strongest evidence: my audio recordings.
Every time I mentioned the recordings, the Justice became visibly irritated, making it clear I was unwelcome to bring them up. On the third day of trial, he asked me which recordings I planned to play. I explained each one. After I finished, he abruptly said: “Your recordings are only admissible if they contain the Plaintiff or his realtor. If neither of them are in it, the recording is inadmissible.”
I was stunned. I wanted to respond right then and there—but instead, I waited until I got home and looked up the law, because I knew something wasn’t right. Sure enough, the law is crystal clear: audio and video recordings are generally welcomed by the court, especially because they provide powerful, objective evidence. The only requirement is that they be relevant. And what could be more relevant than an audio recording of the actual event in question?
I’m representing myself pro se. That means judges and attorneys must be especially careful not to mislead me—either by giving legal advice or, worse, giving legal advice that is blatantly wrong. So why was Justice Billings telling me—before I’d even tried to formally submit the recordings—that they were inadmissible? He knows the rules of evidence. He knows relevance is the key standard.
The next day, I raised the issue again. I told the court the recordings were relevant. I also pointed out that the Plaintiff had had copies of them for over three years. They’d been referenced in multiple motions. The Plaintiff had never questioned their authenticity—in fact, he’d confirmed it—and had never objected to them being used as evidence.
Instead of correcting the record or softening his tone, the Justice doubled down. I was met with open contempt. He refused to allow this powerful, probative evidence.
It’s like someone caught a bank robbery on video, and instead of allowing the jury to see the footage, the judge insists they rely only on the testimony of a known liar—someone who completely contradicts the clear facts.
That’s what happened here. And it should alarm everyone.
This report documents what may be the most disturbing abuse of the civil justice system in modern Maine legal history. The case of Pierce v. Rinaldi, docket number CV-2021-138, is not merely a private contract dispute — it is a documented collapse of due process, ethical lawyering, and judicial neutrality. Through court transcripts, party communications, evidentiary filings, and public records, a pattern emerges: the defendant, Anthony Rinaldi, a self-represented litigant, exposed perjury, altered documents, discovery violations, and judicial bias — and yet was ultimately punished for telling the truth!
Over the course of four years, Rinaldi spent more than 5,000 hours studying and teaching himself the law. He filed motions that rivaled those of seasoned attorneys, constructed meticulous timelines, exposed contradictions in the plaintiffs’ affidavits, and documented discovery abuse in real time. In many instances, he correctly predicted the legal consequences of plaintiffs’ conduct long before the court acknowledged any issues — and in most cases, the court never did.
Incredibly, even after discovering post-trial that Plaintiff Drew Pierce had purchased and profited from a home he denied under oath, the court not only refused to act but accepted filings out of order — two weeks late, after the final decision had already been issued. The court clerk admitted this was “unusual” with no further explanation.
This report presents an integrated legal and factual analysis of the case. It will demonstrate how systemic failure enabled a fraudulent civil claim to proceed past every safeguard, and why this case now demands full-scale investigation by the Maine Government Oversight Committee (GOC) and Office of Program Evaluation & Government Accountability (OPEGA).
Justice O'Neil claims the Plaintiffs only need to deny, object, and cite evidence to survive Summary Judgment — a statement that is ABSOLUTELY FALSE. He is fully aware that Plaintiffs are required to present Prima Facie Evidenceto withstand Summary Judgment, yet he falsely tells me otherwise — a CLEAR LIE.
Justice O'Neil knows the Plaintiffs should have lost at Summary Judgment for the following reasons:
ANY ONE of these failures should have stopped this massive fraud in its tracks!
I HIRED MATT DIBIASE OF LANDING REAL ESTATE TO SELL MY SPEC HOME AND THIS CLOWN AND HIS BUDDIES EMBEZZLED ROUGHLY $80,000 AND DID EVERYTHING IN THERE POWER TO SCREW ME! THE CONTRACT WAS TERMINATED ON MARCH 4th BECAUSE THE PLAINTIFFS WILLFULLY BREACHED! THE NEXT DAY THE PLAINTIFFS MADE ME AN OFFER WHICH I WAS CONSIDERING TO END THIS NIGHTMARE BUT ON MY WAY TO CLOSING I RECEIVED THE CLOSING STATEMENT WHICH DIDNT MATCH THEIR OFFERED SO I CALLED MATT. 451 CAPE RD IS A HIGH END CUSTOM HOME #slimymatt
The first day of trial couldn’t have gone worse for the plaintiffs. The only evidence they presented was the testimony of compulsive liar Andy Lord. Andy admitted to being the cause of the breach because he misled the defendant, and he misled the plaintiff. His actions were the sole reason the closing didn’t happen. During cross it was proven that the vast majority of Andy’s testimony was all lies. On top of that the text submitted to the court prove the Plaintiffs lied and manipulated
The Defendant had permission to protest from the city prior to Protesting and yet his 1st Amendment Rights were Violated anyways and his banner stolen!!
**Audio from a Conversation with Portland Neighborhood Prosecutor RICHARD BIANCULLI will be added soon.
BOTH THE PLAINTIFF AND I TESTIFIED AT TRIAL THAT OUR AGREEMENT WAS THAT “I GET TO FINISH THE HOUSE EXACTLY HOW I WANT AND HAVE FULL DISCRETION“ WE HAD A MEETING OF THE MINDS AND BOTH TESTIFIED TO THAT SO HOW CAN THE JUDGE SEE IT ANY OTHER WAY? ATTORNEY MONTELEONE DOESN’T MAKE A SINGLE GOOD POINT IN THIS VIDEO BUT TREATS ME LIKE A HOSTILE WITNESS THE ENTIRE TIME DESPITE ANSWERING EVERY QUESTION HE ASKED! I TREATED HIS WITNESSES WITH RESPECT WHILE THEY LIE OR SAY THEY DONT RECALL
THIS CORRUPT LAWSUIT HAS BEEN DRAGGED OUT FOR YEARS SO YOU WOULD THINK THAT THE PLAINTIFFS MUST HAVE SOME GREAT EVIDENCE. WELL, THEY DON’T. AT TRIAL, THE PLAINTIFF WEREN‘T ABLE TO PRODUCE A SINGLE TEXT, EMAIL OR RECORDING THAT SUPPORTED THEIR CASE SO INSTEAD THEIR CASE RELIED ENTIRELY ON THE TESTIMONY OF ANDY LORD BECAUSE THEIR OTHER WITNESS HAS NO PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE BREACH. TWO AND A HALF YEARS AGO CORRUPT ATTORNEY MONTELEONE SAID IN OPEN COURT THAT ANDY LORD IS NO LONGER INVOLVED IN RESPONSE TO BEING QUESTIONS ABOUT ANDY LORDS TWO PERJURIOUS AFFIDAVITS AND YET SURPRISE SURPRISE ANDY IS BACK TO TELL HIS THIRD STORY. AT TRIAL ANDY ATTEMPTED TO PUT ON A PERFORMANCE BUT HE CLEARLY DIDN’T THINK IT THROUGH BECAUSE I HAVE PROOF THAT EVERYTHING HE SAID IS A LIE!! THE CRAZIEST THING ABOUT HIS TESTIMONY IS THAT HE PRETENDED TO HAVE A PERFECT MEMORY WHEN HE LIED BUT HE HAD AMNESIA REGARDING EVERYTHING ELSE!!
AS THE STATES MOST UNETHICAL ATTORNEYJAMES LIKES TO BREAK THE RULES AND HE IS CURRENTLY USING THE LEGAL SYSTEM AS A MEANS TO STEAL FROM AN HONEST SMALL BUSINESS OWNER! BERNSTEINSHUR ATTORNEY JAMES MONTELEONES IS BERNSTEINSHUR‘S SLIMIEST ATTORNEY AND THEY HAVE NO ISSUES WITH HIM COMMITTING FRAUD! LINK TO ENTIRE PAGE COVERING JAMES FRAUD!
REALTOR ANDY LORD OWNS THE LORD GROUP WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY PART OF LANDING REAL ESTATE. ANDY HAS A HARD TIME TELLING THE TRUTH AND TENDS TO LIE EVEN WHEN HE DOESN‘T NEED TO. LINK TO ENTIRE PAGE COVERING ANDYS FRAUD!
MATT HAS A BAD HABIT OF THINKING HES BETTER THAN EVERYONE AND HAS BEEN KNOWN TO TELL HIS OWN CLIENTS TO ”SHOVE IT UP YOUR ASS” HE HAS ALWAYS BEEN A SPOILED BRAT AND THROWS TEMPTER TANTRUMS WHEN HE DOESNT GET HIS WAY!! LINK TO ENTIRE PAGE COVERING SLIMY MATTS FRAUD!!
IT’S STILL UNCLEAR WHY ONE OF THE STATES MOST POWERFUL ATTORNEYS WAS CO COUNSEL TO CORRUPT ATTORNEY JAMES MONTELEONE AT TRIAL BUT THERE IS A ZERO PERCENT CHANCE THAT HIS PRESENCE IN THE COURTROOM DIDN’T AFFECT THE OUTCOME!
DEREK IS A TYPICAL RICH KID WHO THINKS HES BETTER THAN EVERYONE AND ACTS LIKE A TOOL 99% OF THE TIME. ON TOP OF BEING A LANDING AGENT DEREK OWNS SEBAGO LAKE BOAT RENTALS SO WATCH OUT FOR THIS SLIMEBALL!!
TODD MIRANDA FINANCED MY CONSTRUCTION LOAN AND ALLOWED HIS BUDDIES MATT DIBIASE, ANDY LORD AND DEREK RAY TO EMBEZZLE MY EQUITY BEHIND MY BACK. WHEN CONFRONTED I WAS THREATENED BY THIS CLOWN!
PLAINTIFF DREW PIERCE CRIED ON THE STAND AT TRIAL CLAIMING TO BE PRACTICALLY HOMELESS ALL WHILE LIVING IN A 3/4 MILLION DOLLAR HOME ON THE WATER. DREW COMMITTED PERJURY ON A GRAND SCALE AT TRIAL!
ITS COMMON KNOWLEDGE THAT EVERYONE HAS A RIGHT TO PROTEST IN A PARK WITH A SIGN! EVEN THOUGHT I KNEW I HAD THE RIGHT TO PROTEST I STILL CALLED PORTLAND PD JUST TO MAKE SURE AND THEY GAVE ME THE GREEN LIGHT. THE POLICE AND PARK RANGERS WERE CALLED EACH TIME I PROTESTED BUT I EMPHASIZED THAT ITS MY FIRST AMENDMENT AND THEY LEFT WITHOUT ISSU
ITS COMMON KNOWLEDGE THAT EVERYONE HAS A RIGHT TO PROTEST IN A PARK WITH A SIGN! EVEN THOUGHT I KNEW I HAD THE RIGHT TO PROTEST I STILL CALLED PORTLAND PD JUST TO MAKE SURE AND THEY GAVE ME THE GREEN LIGHT. THE POLICE AND PARK RANGERS WERE CALLED EACH TIME I PROTESTED BUT I EMPHASIZED THAT ITS MY FIRST AMENDMENT AND THEY LEFT WITHOUT ISSUE. THEN BERNSTEINSHUR REACHED OUT TO RICHARD BIANCULLI AND MICHAEL GOLDMAN WHO CONCOCTED A PLAN TO DEPRIVE ME OF MY 1st AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND SURE ENOUGH MY SIGN WAS STOLEN BY THE CITY OF PORTLAND AND I WAS CITED UNDER THE CITIES LANDBANK ORDINANCE WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PROTESTING OR CITIZENS. **CHECK OUT THE VIDEO BELOW!
Coming soon!
Coming soon
SOUND FAR FETCHED? Well it's TRUE
**WEBSITE WILL BE UPDATED SOON!!
**TIMELINE WILL BE ADDED SOON
This folder contains all the Motions sorted by year as well as hearing audio, trial audio and Evidence!
The Defendant points out how insane this Lawsuit is! The evidence presented to the court was CRYSTAL CLEAR showing that the Plaintiffs breached not the Defendant and yet Attorney Monteleone has nothing to say for himself.
Justice O'Neil states that the Plaintiffs don't need to do anything to survive Summary Judgement but deny, object and cite evidence which is ABSOLUTELY FALSE!! Justice O'Neil is well aware that the Plaintiffs must present Prima Facie Evidence to survive Summary Judgement but he tells the Defendant they don't which is CLEARLY A LIE! Furthermore, the Plaintiffs should have lost at Summary Judgement for the following reasons:
1. Failed to Present Prima Facie
2. Failed to Cite Evidence
3. Failed to Provide the Required Affidavit Per Rule 56
4. Failed to Refute Unclean Hands
5. Failed to Refute Judicial Estoppel
6. Failed to Present a Plausible Legal Argument
7. Failed to Provide Any Evidence
8. Failed to Refute Anticipatory Repudiation